Friday, 6 May 2016

Unit 30 Advertising standards

Daniel  
                                                                                                                           17/02/16
Denplan Ltd

Financial
Number of complaints: 11
 A TV a being a dental health insurance provider.
Issue: Misleading because cosmetic dentistry is not covered by Denplan.
Rulings: Upheld
ASA noticed that the absence of explanation in the ad the viewers were likely to interpret that poor teeth can be covered through Deplan including cosmetic interventions but that was not the case
 Therefore the advert can be misleading.
I believe that ASA as done the right thing by upholding the ad because it provides the viewers with unreliable information. The adverts main purpose is to get the message across that if want to love you teeth use denplan, which will avoid the problems of the character in the ad ( Bad teeth ). Denplan covers regular check-ups, polishing scaling but some treatment may require cosmetic intervention which it did not cover.



Designer Sofas 4u Ltd

Number of complaints: 1
A website www.designersofas4u.co.uk stated 50% off a selected leather sofa RRP save 600.
Issue: The sale end date was misleading and the RRP was misleading.
Assessment: The valid until date had been extended quite a few times, giving the impression that the sale price was going to end but wasn’t the case, concluded that the ad was misleading.
Ruling: Upheld
The ad breached CAP code rules 3.1 (misleading advertising).
I agree with the evaluation because the advert showed sale prices but the RRP wasn’t actually at that value and that the sale date from and end was continually extended therefore it is a ‘fake’ sale.

Iceland Foods Ltd


Media:
Ad
Showed a Iceland product named “FAT bastard” branded wine.
Issue: May cause serious or widespread offense
Ad was inappropriately targeted because it might be seen by young children
Ruling: Upheld/ Not upheld
ASA claimed that the word FAT bastard wouldn’t cause ‘serious’ widespread offense therefore deemed acceptable as it did not breach the code.
However the ad may have been inappropriate for children.



Worlds Slimmest Phone

Number of complaints: 1
Avert showing a woman barely dressed ironing clothes and when the phone rings she pulls it out and a voice saying " The worlds slimmist phone”
Excessive show of skin makes the advert sexual.
The advert is sexist as it portrays an idea that woman have to be slim comparing a woman to a slim phone.
Rulings: Upheld
ASA ruled that the advert is simply wrong.





Paddy Power Ltd

Number of complaints 5000+
Ad: Text “ ITS OSCAR TIME”, MONEY BACK IF HE WALKS, WE WILL REFUND ALL LOSING BETS ON THE OSCAR PISTORIOUS TRIAL IF HE IS NOT FOUND GUILTY.
Discrimination of the disabled and betting on trials of murder.
Issues: Insensitive, trivialising issues surrounding murder trial, death of woman and disability. Cause widespread offense.
ASA challenged if the ad bought adverting to disrepute.
Rulings: Upheld
In my opinion I think the ad is wrong because it is to cause offense in many ways.











No comments:

Post a Comment